Free Giveaway.

Get Your Special Gift

Adsense Profit Exposed

Click HERE to get your copy for free

Free Money Making Tips Now!

Join my Free Sign-Up Internet Marketing 9 Lesson Course and I will show you Free Money Making Tips-Worth $500!

First Name:
Email address:


Note: Your information is private and will never be shared with anyone. We respect your privacy and we hate SPAM with a passion.

Make Money Video Tutorials

How Web Video SEO is Finally Coming of Age

Filed Under (Internet Marketing News, SEO, lists, youtube) by Effofeplulund on 01-02-2010

If you're new here and find this article useful, please consider subcribing to my RSS feed. Thank you for visiting!

video seo imageThough publishing videos on the web has been child’s play for years now, the process of getting them to rank high in search remains enigmatic at best, frustrating at worst. The pace of video publication is accelerating faster than ever, and though video SEO seems to have been left behind the rest of the industry, it’s finally starting to catch up through some exciting developments that will hopefully provide more incentives for publishers to produce great video content.

As we start a new year and a new decade, here’s a look at the state of web video SEO right now.


The State of Web Video

When you produce a video now, there’s no dearth of places to publish it. Though YouTube remains the dominant player in the industry, Vimeo, Blip.tv, Viddler, Metacafe, and a host of other sites (most of them free) have fragmented the market. There’s no need to build or host your own video player, and you can leave the heavy bandwidth duties to them rather than your own server.

Just as there’s lots of competition in the platform arena, competition among videos themselves is growing wildly. YouTube spokesman Aaron Zamost said over 20 hours of video are uploaded to the site every minute, and about 120 decades of video are uploaded each year.

Hundreds of little tweaks and tricks exist in optimizing a webpage for search, yet the entire realm of video SEO right now consists of only a few to-dos and a lot of finger-crossing. Zamost summed up the basics for ranking high in a YouTube search:

“Have a clear, descriptive title, and include as many accurate tags as you can. For example, if you’ve created a video that shows how to tie a bow tie, your title should be ‘How to tie a bow tie.’ That’s really important, because that’s [what] your target viewer probably wanted to learn. So think visually — ties, dress, how to dress nice, how to tie a tie, how to tie a bow tie, etc.

It’s also important to note that many users who are searching for video just want to be entertained, and may not be looking for something that precise. So if you’ve created compelling content, think about how a user would likely find it. Tags like ‘funny video,’ while generic, can be very useful.”

Many publishers, however, are concerned with getting links and traffic to their site, not just their YouTube page. Rand Fishkin, CEO and co-founder of the multi-million dollar SEO agency SEOmoz, emphasizes the importance of placing videos on your own site and submitting a video sitemap to search engines.

“Video results are often far easier to ‘rank,’ than standard web results, but there are some hoops you’ll need to jump through,” Fishkin said in an e-mail.

However, users sharing videos by embedding or linking to them in their own sites often leads to traffic and link juice being sent to the third party site (like YouTube or Metacafe) that actually hosts the video, rather than a publisher’s own. A vital part of SEO strategy is getting other websites to link to your site. If people are linking to your content on YouTube, your site doesn’t build much (if any) link equity or page rank at all, which can be discouraging for web publishers.


New Developments

Because search engine robots only understand actual text, they can’t determine the quality of a video by the content inside it — only by the links to it and the content around it, like the title or tags. People have muddled over this problem for a long time, and a couple of realistic solutions have recently emerged.

First, YouTube now has the ability to place captions on its videos. The transcript of a video can be attached to its timeline, allowing users seek to specific portions of YouTube videos by phrase. This transcript can be searched and indexed by the engines, meaning your video content itself can count toward ranking now. Whereas originally you had to provide your own captions to attach, YouTube can now do captions automatically. As with any robotic transcription however, human intervention may be required to fix computer-generated mistakes in the text.

Placing a video’s transcript in its description has been a somewhat common SEO practice in the past, but the marriage of the transcript to the video timeline itself is a definite advancement.

Another company to recently stumble on a similar solution for web video SEO is the New York-based SpeakerText. SpeakerText helps you perform the same transcript-to-video matrimony as YouTube captions, but further puts SEO power in publishers’ hands through a concept it calls “QuoteLinks.”

Basically, once your video has been “speakertexted,” you can embed it on your own website with the transcript attached. Visitors can select a chunk of the transcript, copy it, and paste it in their own blog or website as a link to the exact moment in the video where the quote appears. The link goes to the publisher’s site, not YouTube’s. Right now SpeakerText only works with YouTube, but the company says it plans to provide the service for other platforms in the future.

“Anytime somebody quotes, it will link back to the original source, which is good for the end user because they can actually see it in context,” said CEO Matt Mireles, “… and the publisher gets rewarded because it not only sends viral traffic directly, but then the link creates huge SEO.”

SpeakerText is free if you provide your own transcript, and you can order transcription through the site at what it claims is roughly half the cost of traditional transcription services. SpeakerText utilizes an army of “Turkees” at Mechanical Turk to do the transcribing.


The Future

So what’s next for video SEO?

Fishkin believes that new platforms like the iPad and the Android Marketplace have big implications for the future. “I suspect this divergence of video from the open web to closed platforms (a curious shift indeed) may have some substantive impact in the future,” he said.

Zamost said that “social elements are playing an increasingly important role in the development of new features on YouTube, especially related to search and discovery.” The incorporation of social trends in search algorithms could spell big changes indeed for the SEO industry.

Whatever happens next, it’s clear that video SEO is finally starting to catch up to the rest of the web. With services like SpeakerText and YouTube captions emerging to help eliminate unsearchable content issues, the future likely holds more automated and accurate video-text mapping and perhaps eventually video editing in the cloud.

What changes are you hoping for? Share your thoughts in the comments below.


More web video resources from Mashable:


- YouTube Is the Top Social Media Innovation of the Decade
5 Eye-Popping 3D YouTube Videos
8 Companies That Are Reinventing TV Online
5 Best YouTube Sports Moments of 2009
The 10 Most Innovative Viral Video Ads of 2009
7 of the Most Inspiring Videos on the Web

Image courtesy of iStockphoto, parasoley

Tags: metacafe, Search, search engine optimization, SEO, social media, speakertext, stats, viddler, video, Vimeo, web video, youtube


See the original post here: 
How Web Video SEO is Finally Coming of Age

If you found this article useful, please consider donating to this site.

Add this to : Digg! Digg it Bookmark! Save to Del.icio.us Subscribe to RSS Subscribe to My RSS feed

Google Reader Lets You Subscribe to Any Page on the Web

Filed Under (Internet Marketing Idea, RSS, news) by fjjjujjnk on 25-01-2010

RSS technology makes it possible for anyone to keep up with fresh content without having to visit the site in question. Now the same holds for webpages without RSS thanks to a new Google Reader feature.

Today Google has rolled out a subtle change to Google Reader that lets you create custom feeds to track pages that don’t already have them. So you can subscribe to updates for any webpage simply by typing the URL into the “Add a subscription” text box.

Should you put the new feature to work, you’ll start to receive short snippets for any updates made to the pages, and Google asserts that it’s committed to improving the quality of these tiny blurbs over time. On the flip side, webpage owners can choose to opt out by adjusting a few lines of code.

So when might this come in handy? While most companies have their own blogs, receiving automatic notifications any time there’s an update to the homepage or product pages of a business of interest could prove to be vital. For example, with Apple releasing a “new product” and potentially news about the iPhone on Wednesday, you bet that I’m going to create some custom feeds.

[img credit: filiph]

Tags: Google, google reader, rss, trending


Continued here:
Google Reader Lets You Subscribe to Any Page on the Web

If you found this article useful, please consider donating to this site.

Add this to : Digg! Digg it Bookmark! Save to Del.icio.us Subscribe to RSS Subscribe to My RSS feed

Top 10 News Readers Judged by Mashable Readers

Filed Under (Adsense, Internet Marketing Idea, RSS, lists, twitter) by iuyutfrtdrsea on 20-11-2009

poll-imageEach Friday we choose a Lunchtime Poll topic to get a sense of how Mashable readers feel about the chosen topic of the week. Below are the results from last Friday’s poll, where we asked for your favorite news reader.

Is your favorite app or service not represented in the list? Let us know in the comments! And to make sure your vote counts next time, be sure to vote in this week’s Lunchtime Poll, where we want to know your favorite video-sharing service.

A surprising number of readers in the top 10 were Mac apps, and enough of you said you’d switched to using Twitter as your primary news source to propel it to #5. Google Reader was far and away the winner though, with over three times the number of votes for the 2nd place finisher Feedly.


Top 10 Mashable Reader News Readers


10. Reeder (iPhone) [warning: iTunes link]

9. Times (Mac)

8. Klipfolio

7. Shrook (Mac)

6. NetNewsWire (Mac)

5. Twitter

4. FeedDemon (Windows)

3. NetVibes

2. Feedly

1. Google Reader

Image courtesy of iStockphoto, ericsphotography


Reviews: Google Reader, Twitter, feedly, iStockphoto

Tags: google reader, lunchtime poll, news readers, polls, rss, twitter


See the original post here:
Top 10 News Readers Judged by Mashable Readers

If you found this article useful, please consider donating to this site.

Add this to : Digg! Digg it Bookmark! Save to Del.icio.us Subscribe to RSS Subscribe to My RSS feed

LUNCHTIME POLL: What’s Your Favorite News Reader?

Filed Under (Internet Marketing News, RSS) by Roomma on 13-11-2009

poll-imageFriday is a happy time for many, which makes it the perfect time for our weekly Lunchtime Poll! If you’ve participated before, you know we throw out a poll question, start off with some responses from the staff here at Mashable, and let you fine folks have at it in the comments.

Last week we wanted to know about your favorite Twitter photo-sharing services, and the results are in if you want to know how they stack up for Mashable readers. This week we’re curious about your RSS habits. Some pundits have claimed that RSS is dead, but we think the news of its death may be greatly exaggerated. Do you use a news reader? If RSS is dead to you too, be sure to let us know that in the comments as well.

What’s your favorite news reader?


Mashable Faves


Adam Ostrow: Google Reader … still makes it easy to read my favorite news sources all in one place

Pete Cashmore: Google Reader. Lazyfeed is getting some buzz but I haven’t gotten into the habit of using it.

Sharon Feder: Google Reader — it’s a simple, reliable, and an important tool I use daily.

Adam Hirsch: I used to be FeedDemon, but I’m all Google Reader for portability and speed. I set it as a separate Chrome app.

Josh Catone: I’m perhaps the only person on the planet who can’t stand Google Reader. I use Vienna on Mac, and FeedDemon on Windows.

Ben Parr: Google Reader, and it’s not even close.

Jennifer Van Grove: Google Reader, it’s my lifeline to the outside world.

Christina Warren: Fever. You have to host it yourself but it’s pure gold if you have lots of feeds.

Barb Dybwad: Primarily NetNewsWire on the Mac, but I’ve been using Google Reader again a lot more for serendipity finds since they added Magic sort (it’s magic!).

Image courtesy of iStockphoto, ericsphotography


Reviews: Chrome, Google Reader, Mashable, iStockphoto

Tags: FeedDemon, fever, google reader, lunchtime poll, netnewswire, news reader, rss, vienna


View post: 
LUNCHTIME POLL: What’s Your Favorite News Reader?

If you found this article useful, please consider donating to this site.

Add this to : Digg! Digg it Bookmark! Save to Del.icio.us Subscribe to RSS Subscribe to My RSS feed

Google Reader Adds Magic to Your Feeds

Filed Under (Adsense, Internet Marketing News, RSS, news) by indedeNig on 22-10-2009

greader-magicGoogle added a couple of nice changes to Reader to serve the goals of improving your discovery of new items and personalizing your feed reading experience.

First up, they’ve introduced a new Explore section designed to enhance discovery. A new “Popular items” section helps the most interesting new stories bubble to the top. Popular items surface the news stories or viral videos gaining attention around the web, not just from within your own subscriptions.

The recommendations feature has been renamed “Recommended sources” and moved over into the new Explore section. It makes use of your web history if you’re opted-in plus your Reader Trends to recommend new sources you might want to subscribe to.

The next change is a great step towards an even more personalized feed reading experience. The new personalized ranking feature re-orders the items in your unread feed based on your own past reading history and overall activity inside Reader. It gives you a view of your feeds informed by what you’ve liked and shared in the past.

To turn on the personalized ranking view, go to the Feed or Folder settings dropdown in the feed or folder you’re viewing and select the playfully named “Sort by magic” setting. If you don’t like the results, you can improve them over time by liking and sharing items in your feeds.

Let us know your thoughts on popular and personalized addictions to Google Reader. Does it enhance your information-gathering experience? Will it increase your usage of Google Reader, or have the potential to make you switch RSS programs? Or is RSS just plain dead to you?


Reviews: Google Reader

Tags: feeds, Google, google reader, personalization, Recommendations, rss


View post:
Google Reader Adds Magic to Your Feeds

If you found this article useful, please consider donating to this site.

Add this to : Digg! Digg it Bookmark! Save to Del.icio.us Subscribe to RSS Subscribe to My RSS feed